Checkmarx vs Semgrep
Checkmarx and Semgrep are both enterprise application security solutions. Checkmarx enterprise application security platform with deep SAST, SCA, DAST, and supply chain security, while Semgrep lightweight, open-source static analysis with intuitive pattern-matching rules and fast scan performance. The best choice depends on your organization's size, technical requirements, and budget.
Updated Feb 2026Summary
Choose Checkmarx if SAST depth and accuracy from two decades of development is your priority and large enterprises that need comprehensive, compliance-driven application security testing with deep SAST accuracy and centralized security governance. Choose Semgrep if open-source core engine with no licensing costs for CLI usage matters most and security-conscious development teams that want fast, customizable static analysis with the ability to write organization-specific security rules.
Choose Checkmarx if:
- You value SAST depth and accuracy from two decades of development
- You value comprehensive platform covering SAST, SCA, DAST, and API security
- You value strong compliance reporting and governance capabilities
- You want to avoid sCA capabilities are less mature than Snyk's established dependency scanning
- You want to avoid no container image or IaC scanning capabilities
Choose Semgrep if:
- You value open-source core engine with no licensing costs for CLI usage
- You value custom rule authoring is significantly easier than any competing tool
- You value extremely fast scan performance suitable for every PR and commit
- You want to avoid significantly more expensive than Snyk with enterprise-only pricing
- You want to avoid developer experience is less intuitive than Snyk's workflow integration
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Checkmarx | Semgrep |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Custom enterprise pricing (typically $50K+ annually) | Free (open-source CLI) / Team from $40/developer/month / Enterprise custom |
| Pricing Model | Enterprise license (project/user-based) | Per-developer (monthly) |
| Open Source | No | Yes |
| Deployment | Cloud, Self-Hosted | Cloud, Self-Hosted |
| Best For | Large enterprises that need comprehensive, compliance-driven application security testing with deep SAST accuracy and centralized security governance | Security-conscious development teams that want fast, customizable static analysis with the ability to write organization-specific security rules |
| Advanced SAST with deep dataflow anal... | Supported | Not available |
| Dynamic application security testing ... | Supported | Not available |
| API security testing | Supported | Not available |
Sources
- Checkmarx. Official Website & DocumentationVendor
- Semgrep. Official Website & DocumentationVendor
- Checkmarx Reviews on G2User Reviews
- Semgrep Reviews on G2User Reviews
- Checkmarx Reviews on TrustRadiusUser Reviews
- Semgrep Reviews on TrustRadiusUser Reviews
- Checkmarx Reviews on PeerSpotUser Reviews
- Semgrep Reviews on PeerSpotUser Reviews
- Gartner Magic Quadrant for Application Security Testing 2024Analyst Report
- Forrester Wave: Static Application Security Testing, Q3 2024Analyst Report
- Forrester Wave: Software Composition Analysis, Q2 2024Analyst Report
- OWASP Top 10 Web Application Security RisksIndustry Framework
- NIST Secure Software Development Framework (SSDF)Government Standard
- Gartner Peer Insights: ASTPeer Reviews