Checkmarx vs Veracode
Checkmarx and Veracode are both enterprise application security solutions. Checkmarx enterprise application security platform with deep SAST, SCA, DAST, and supply chain security, while Veracode cloud-based application security testing platform with SAST, SCA, DAST, and penetration testing. The best choice depends on your organization's size, technical requirements, and budget.
Updated Feb 2026The Bottom Line
Choose Checkmarx if industry-leading SAST depth and accuracy from two decades of development is your priority and large enterprises that need comprehensive, compliance-driven application security testing with deep SAST accuracy and centralized security governance. Choose Veracode if binary-level SAST enables testing without source code access matters most and security teams managing application security across large application portfolios, especially when binary analysis of third-party or legacy applications is needed.
Choose Checkmarx if:
- You value industry-leading SAST depth and accuracy from two decades of development
- You value comprehensive platform covering SAST, SCA, DAST, and API security
- You value strong compliance reporting and governance capabilities
- You want to avoid binary analysis requires compilation, slowing scan integration in CI/CD
- You want to avoid developer experience is less intuitive compared to Snyk's workflow approach
Choose Veracode if:
- You value binary-level SAST enables testing without source code access
- You value comprehensive platform covering SAST, SCA, DAST, and pen testing
- You value strong application portfolio management and risk scoring
- You want to avoid significantly more expensive than Snyk with enterprise-only pricing
- You want to avoid developer experience is less intuitive than Snyk's workflow integration
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Checkmarx | Veracode |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Custom enterprise pricing (typically $50K+ annually) | Custom enterprise pricing (typically $30K+ annually) |
| Pricing Model | Enterprise license (project/user-based) | Enterprise license (application-based) |
| Open Source | No | No |
| Deployment | Cloud, Self-Hosted | Cloud |
| Best For | Large enterprises that need comprehensive, compliance-driven application security testing with deep SAST accuracy and centralized security governance | Security teams managing application security across large application portfolios, especially when binary analysis of third-party or legacy applications is needed |
| Advanced SAST with deep dataflow anal... | Supported | Not available |
| API security testing | Supported | Not available |
| Supply chain security analysis | Supported | Not available |
Sources
- Checkmarx — Official Website & DocumentationVendor
- Veracode — Official Website & DocumentationVendor
- Checkmarx Reviews on G2User Reviews
- Veracode Reviews on G2User Reviews
- Checkmarx Reviews on TrustRadiusUser Reviews
- Veracode Reviews on TrustRadiusUser Reviews
- Checkmarx Reviews on PeerSpotUser Reviews
- Veracode Reviews on PeerSpotUser Reviews
- Gartner Magic Quadrant for Application Security Testing 2024Analyst Report
- Forrester Wave: Static Application Security Testing, Q3 2024Analyst Report
- Forrester Wave: Software Composition Analysis, Q2 2024Analyst Report
- OWASP Top 10 Web Application Security RisksIndustry Framework
- NIST Secure Software Development Framework (SSDF)Government Standard
- Gartner Peer Insights: ASTPeer Reviews