CyberArk Conjur vs Google Cloud Secret Manager

Google Cloud Secret Manager and CyberArk Conjur are both cloud-native solutions. Google Cloud Secret Manager gCP-native secrets storage with versioning and audit, while CyberArk Conjur enterprise privileged access and secrets management platform. The best choice depends on your organization's size, technical requirements, and budget.

Updated Feb 2026
How we compare:This comparison is based on official documentation, public pricing, community discussions, and aggregated user feedback, not hands-on testing by our team. We organize what real users and practitioners are saying across the web.

The Bottom Line

Choose Google Cloud Secret Manager if simple and intuitive API is your priority and teams running workloads on Google Cloud Platform. Choose CyberArk Conjur if enterprise-grade security matters most and large enterprises with complex compliance and PAM requirements.

Choose CyberArk Conjur if:

  • You value simple and intuitive API
  • You value generous free tier
  • You value strong GCP integration
  • You want to avoid complex setup and configuration
  • You want to avoid enterprise pricing can be high

Choose Google Cloud Secret Manager if:

  • You value enterprise-grade security
  • You value open-source community edition
  • You value strong compliance support
  • You want to avoid gCP lock-in
  • You want to avoid fewer rotation features than AWS

Feature Comparison

FeatureCyberArk ConjurGoogle Cloud Secret Manager
PricingFree for 6 active versions + $0.06/10k access opsOpen source (Community) / Enterprise pricing on request
Pricing ModelPer-operationEnterprise license
Open SourceNoYes
DeploymentCloudCloud, Self-Hosted
Best ForTeams running workloads on Google Cloud PlatformLarge enterprises with complex compliance and PAM requirements
IAM-based access controlSupportedNot available
Customer-managed encryption keysSupportedNot available
Regional and multi-regional replicationSupportedNot available