CyberArk vs SplitSecure
CyberArk is the market leader in enterprise privileged access management, offering comprehensive credential vaulting, session management, and identity security. SplitSecure takes a fundamentally different approach, distributing credentials across devices using Shamir Secret Sharing so no single device or vendor ever holds a complete secret. CyberArk suits organisations needing full-featured enterprise PAM, while SplitSecure is purpose-built for the highest-sensitivity accounts where vendor dependency and single points of compromise are unacceptable.
Updated Feb 2026The Bottom Line
CyberArk is the right choice for organisations needing full enterprise PAM coverage across thousands of accounts with session recording, account discovery, and deep identity integration. SplitSecure is the right choice for protecting the 10-20 accounts where a breach means catastrophe, with cryptographic separation of duties and zero vendor dependency that traditional vaults cannot provide. Many regulated financial services organisations are adopting a layered approach, using CyberArk for broad PAM and SplitSecure for their highest-risk credentials.
Choose CyberArk if:
- You need comprehensive enterprise PAM with session recording and account discovery
- You require broad coverage across thousands of privileged accounts
- You need deep integration with Active Directory and enterprise identity providers
- Your compliance requirements demand traditional credential vaulting and rotation
- You have the budget and dedicated team to manage an enterprise PAM deployment
Choose SplitSecure if:
- You need zero vendor dependency so credentials work even if the vendor goes offline
- You handle highest-sensitivity accounts in regulated industries subject to DORA, NYDFS, PCI DSS 4.0, or SOX
- You need cryptographic separation of duties that cannot be bypassed by admin access or social engineering
- You want mandatory audit trails that are architecturally impossible to circumvent
- You want fast deployment without months of professional services
Feature Comparison
| Feature | CyberArk | SplitSecure |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Focus | Full enterprise PAM platform | Highest-sensitivity account protection |
| Architecture | Centralised credential vault | Distributed Shamir Secret Sharing across devices |
| Vendor Dependency | Requires CyberArk infrastructure | Zero. Credentials work if SplitSecure goes offline |
| Session Recording | Full session monitoring and recording | Not available |
| Account Discovery | Automated privileged account discovery | Not available |
| Separation of Duties | Policy-based approval workflows | Cryptographically enforced via threshold reconstruction |
| Implementation Time | 3-6 months typical | Days |
| Pricing | Custom enterprise pricing | Contact for pricing |