Infisical vs Google Cloud Secret Manager

Google Cloud Secret Manager and Infisical are both cloud-native solutions. Google Cloud Secret Manager gCP-native secrets storage with versioning and audit, while Infisical open-source end-to-end encrypted secrets management for teams. The best choice depends on your organization's size, technical requirements, and budget.

Updated Feb 2026
How we compare:This comparison is based on official documentation, public pricing, community discussions, and aggregated user feedback, not hands-on testing by our team. We organize what real users and practitioners are saying across the web.

The Bottom Line

Choose Google Cloud Secret Manager if simple and intuitive API is your priority and teams running workloads on Google Cloud Platform. Choose Infisical if open-source and transparent matters most and teams wanting open-source with a modern developer experience.

Choose Infisical if:

  • You value simple and intuitive API
  • You value generous free tier
  • You value strong GCP integration
  • You want to avoid newer platform, less proven at scale
  • You want to avoid fewer integrations than Vault

Choose Google Cloud Secret Manager if:

  • You value open-source and transparent
  • You value modern UI and developer experience
  • You value self-host or cloud option
  • You want to avoid gCP lock-in
  • You want to avoid fewer rotation features than AWS

Feature Comparison

FeatureInfisicalGoogle Cloud Secret Manager
PricingFree for 6 active versions + $0.06/10k access opsFree (self-hosted) / Cloud from $6/user/month
Pricing ModelPer-operationPer-user
Open SourceNoYes
DeploymentCloudCloud, Self-Hosted
Best ForTeams running workloads on Google Cloud PlatformTeams wanting open-source with a modern developer experience
IAM-based access controlSupportedNot available
Customer-managed encryption keysSupportedNot available
Regional and multi-regional replicationSupportedNot available