Semgrep vs Checkmarx
Checkmarx and Semgrep are both enterprise application security solutions. Checkmarx enterprise application security platform with deep SAST, SCA, DAST, and supply chain security, while Semgrep lightweight, open-source static analysis with intuitive pattern-matching rules and fast scan performance. The best choice depends on your organization's size, technical requirements, and budget.
Updated Feb 2026The Bottom Line
Choose Checkmarx if industry-leading SAST depth and accuracy from two decades of development is your priority and large enterprises that need comprehensive, compliance-driven application security testing with deep SAST accuracy and centralized security governance. Choose Semgrep if open-source core engine with no licensing costs for CLI usage matters most and security-conscious development teams that want fast, customizable static analysis with the ability to write organization-specific security rules.
Choose Semgrep if:
- You value industry-leading SAST depth and accuracy from two decades of development
- You value comprehensive platform covering SAST, SCA, DAST, and API security
- You value strong compliance reporting and governance capabilities
- You want to avoid sCA capabilities are less mature than Snyk's established dependency scanning
- You want to avoid no container image or IaC scanning capabilities
Choose Checkmarx if:
- You value open-source core engine with no licensing costs for CLI usage
- You value custom rule authoring is significantly easier than any competing tool
- You value extremely fast scan performance suitable for every PR and commit
- You want to avoid significantly more expensive than Snyk with enterprise-only pricing
- You want to avoid developer experience is less intuitive than Snyk's workflow integration
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Semgrep | Checkmarx |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Custom enterprise pricing (typically $50K+ annually) | Free (open-source CLI) / Team from $40/developer/month / Enterprise custom |
| Pricing Model | Enterprise license (project/user-based) | Per-developer (monthly) |
| Open Source | No | Yes |
| Deployment | Cloud, Self-Hosted | Cloud, Self-Hosted |
| Best For | Large enterprises that need comprehensive, compliance-driven application security testing with deep SAST accuracy and centralized security governance | Security-conscious development teams that want fast, customizable static analysis with the ability to write organization-specific security rules |
| Advanced SAST with deep dataflow anal... | Supported | Not available |
| Dynamic application security testing ... | Supported | Not available |
| API security testing | Supported | Not available |
Sources
- Checkmarx — Official Website & DocumentationVendor
- Semgrep — Official Website & DocumentationVendor
- Checkmarx Reviews on G2User Reviews
- Semgrep Reviews on G2User Reviews
- Checkmarx Reviews on TrustRadiusUser Reviews
- Semgrep Reviews on TrustRadiusUser Reviews
- Checkmarx Reviews on PeerSpotUser Reviews
- Semgrep Reviews on PeerSpotUser Reviews
- Gartner Magic Quadrant for Application Security Testing 2024Analyst Report
- Forrester Wave: Static Application Security Testing, Q3 2024Analyst Report
- Forrester Wave: Software Composition Analysis, Q2 2024Analyst Report
- OWASP Top 10 Web Application Security RisksIndustry Framework
- NIST Secure Software Development Framework (SSDF)Government Standard
- Gartner Peer Insights: ASTPeer Reviews