Virtru vs Egress
Virtru
Virtru provides end-to-end encryption for email and files across Gmail, Outlook, and Google Workspace. Built on the Trusted Data Format (TDF) open standard, Virtru gives senders persistent control over encrypted messages. Including the ability to revoke access, set expiration dates, and disable forwarding after sending. Virtru signs BAAs for HIPAA compliance and offers granular audit logging of every access event.
Pros
- Seamless Gmail and Outlook integration
- Sender retains control after sending
- Open standard (TDF) avoids vendor lock-in
- Strong HIPAA and ITAR compliance posture
- Easy deployment for end users
Considerations
- Recipients must use Virtru reader or verify identity
- Higher price than gateway-only solutions
- Limited to Google and Microsoft ecosystems
- No built-in email hosting
Pricing: See the vendor site for current pricing.
Egress
Egress provides intelligent email security that combines adaptive encryption with AI-powered risk detection. Rather than applying blanket encryption rules, Egress analyzes each email's content, recipients, and context to dynamically determine the right level of protection. From automatic TLS to full end-to-end encryption. Now part of KnowBe4, Egress signs BAAs for HIPAA compliance and is widely used in healthcare, legal, and financial services.
Pros
- Intelligent risk-based encryption reduces over-encryption
- Prevents misdirected emails before they send
- Strong Outlook and Microsoft 365 integration
- Reduces user friction with adaptive policies
- Comprehensive compliance reporting
Considerations
- More complex to configure than simpler solutions
- Primarily Microsoft-focused ecosystem
- Pricing not transparent
- KnowBe4 acquisition may shift product direction
Pricing: Custom pricing