Virtru vs Egress
Virtru
Virtru provides end-to-end encryption for email and files across Gmail, Outlook, and Google Workspace. Built on the Trusted Data Format (TDF) open standard, Virtru gives senders persistent control over encrypted messages — including the ability to revoke access, set expiration dates, and disable forwarding after sending. Virtru signs BAAs for HIPAA compliance and offers granular audit logging of every access event.
Pros
- Seamless Gmail and Outlook integration
- Sender retains control after sending
- Open standard (TDF) avoids vendor lock-in
- Strong HIPAA and ITAR compliance posture
- Easy deployment for end users
Cons
- Recipients must use Virtru reader or verify identity
- Higher price than gateway-only solutions
- Limited to Google and Microsoft ecosystems
- No built-in email hosting
Pricing: From $87/user/year
Egress
Egress provides intelligent email security that combines adaptive encryption with AI-powered risk detection. Rather than applying blanket encryption rules, Egress analyzes each email's content, recipients, and context to dynamically determine the right level of protection — from automatic TLS to full end-to-end encryption. Now part of KnowBe4, Egress signs BAAs for HIPAA compliance and is widely used in healthcare, legal, and financial services.
Pros
- Intelligent risk-based encryption reduces over-encryption
- Prevents misdirected emails before they send
- Strong Outlook and Microsoft 365 integration
- Reduces user friction with adaptive policies
- Comprehensive compliance reporting
Cons
- More complex to configure than simpler solutions
- Primarily Microsoft-focused ecosystem
- Pricing not transparent
- KnowBe4 acquisition may shift product direction
Pricing: Custom pricing