Google Cloud Secret Manager vs Akeyless

Google Cloud Secret Manager offers the simplest API and most generous free tier among cloud-native options. Akeyless provides multi-cloud support and additional features like secure remote access that GCP Secret Manager doesn't offer.

Updated Feb 2026
How we compare:This comparison is based on official documentation, public pricing, community discussions, and aggregated user feedback, not hands-on testing by our team. We organize what real users and practitioners are saying across the web.

The Bottom Line

Choose GCP Secret Manager if you're running on Google Cloud and want the simplest, most cost-effective secrets management. Choose Akeyless if you need multi-cloud support or advanced features beyond basic secret storage.

Choose Google Cloud Secret Manager if:

  • You use multiple cloud providers
  • You need advanced rotation beyond GCP services
  • You want secure remote access features
  • You need a richer feature set for enterprise use
  • You want a single platform across all clouds

Choose Akeyless if:

  • You're running workloads primarily on GCP
  • You want the simplest, most intuitive API
  • You need a generous free tier to start
  • You want automatic versioning built-in
  • You prefer GCP's IAM model for access control

Feature Comparison

FeatureGoogle Cloud Secret ManagerAkeyless
Cloud IntegrationMulti-cloud via gatewaysDeep GCP-native
PricingCustom pricingFree tier + $0.06/10k ops
Secret VersioningVersion trackingAutomatic, built-in
API SimplicityREST APIVery simple REST/gRPC
Multi-CloudAWS, Azure, GCPGCP only
RotationBuilt-in rotation engineBasic (Pub/Sub triggers)
Secure Remote AccessBuilt-in SSH/RDPNot available
EncryptionZero-knowledge DFCCMEK with Cloud KMS

Sources

Related

Google Cloud Secret Manager AlternativesAkeyless AlternativesGoogle Cloud Secret Manager OverviewAkeyless Overview